:PROPERTIES:
:ID:       3994e8d7-8d77-4f52-9650-330369e82143
:END:
#+title: Future-proofing your notes is only worth if the future is relevant
#+date: "2021-04-07 18:53:58 +08:00"
#+date_modified: "2021-05-09 17:23:07 +08:00"
#+language: en


At some point, your notes will be a gigantic mess.
Even if you [[id:ea263f6f-fa8e-4e6d-a585-d30d493d1e3c][Add a desktop search engine for your digital library]] and know the structure, it's not always worth with the overwhelming pile that will accumulate further since you always navigate certain notes through a fixed path.
Similar to certain software projects like Xorg, Rust language, magit, and org-roam, there will be a point where you have to redesign them.
[fn:: Xorg has Wayland as the successor, the Rust community can revise the language freely through editions, magit did have a crownfunding campaign to pay the developer to rewrite it for a year, and org-roam is recently through a major redesign.]
You have to assign a garbage day at some point.

Future-proofing your notes creates pressure on managing your note-taking seriously and efficiently.
You don't want to take notes haphazardly and the overall notes structure will stay the same throughout a year.
They should eventually evolve into [[id:431532c3-6506-4565-b193-dbfb60eac7d6][Evergreen notes]], branching out of the original notes structure and making a better graph for navigation.

An alternative to trashing your notes is to [[id:810dc8b6-db64-4c80-a0aa-f9e6d5fa4acf][Create an inbox to store your thoughts]].

However, focusing too much on future-proofing your notes will limit them because you're limited with the basics of a tool.
You're not using the tool to its full potential and note-taking should make for better thinking.
Also, it's not like those notes will last for centuries.
A lot of the technology can be obselete in decades, constantly challenged with modern tools and findings.
Plus, you always have time to migrate your notes.