mirror of
https://github.com/foo-dogsquared/wiki.git
synced 2025-01-31 01:57:54 +00:00
f5dbb479bb
Ehh... Why I didn't think of those things but here we are. They are going to stay for a little while. Also, there's a slight shift in how I want use my wiki now. Instead of trying to craft every note into a set of evergreen notes. While Andy Matuschak's notes are very practical, it also focuses too much on crafting evergreen notes (a bit too much). Or maybe that was just my impression? Either way, I'll let some of my thoughts to drift if it able to link somewhere in the notes. I think I'm getting the point of Luhmann's original use of Zettelkasten as a research partner.
21 lines
1.1 KiB
Org Mode
21 lines
1.1 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 12dc8b07-ed8b-46d8-bff0-a38d9f3cb83b
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: Diving head-first with a difficult problem is a good indicator of progress
|
|
#+date: "2021-05-20 20:25:47 +08:00"
|
|
#+date_modified: "2021-05-20 20:33:32 +08:00"
|
|
#+language: en
|
|
|
|
|
|
- when starting to learn, diving into problems are often seen as a bad thing
|
|
- it is essentially like trying to learn to swim on an ocean + it could be effective if we have a lifeguard
|
|
- this sink-or-swim mentality can be great if we're to make a difficult problem as our model for progress
|
|
- for example, if you're trying to learn 3D modelling by recreating a massive landscape, you can start with it as an initial exercise
|
|
- at first try, it will fail but you can retry maybe next month to see how well you improve
|
|
- a difficult problem can give us a clear indication of our progress
|
|
- contrast this to learning by starting with the simplest possible example
|
|
- in some capacity, we already have been doing this since we have an idea of what we want to do
|
|
+ a lot of our inspirations tend to be people with advanced levels
|
|
- beware, [[roam:Diving head-first into a difficult problem makes a bad start]]
|